…and You Are NOT A Social Media Authority!
I’m a fundraiser, and I’m getting a little sick of people calling themselves something they are not!
Warning: Rant coming…
A little while ago, I was having a Twitter conversation with nonprofit pros Ian Adair and Jay Frost. We were discussing the over-abundance of people calling themselves Social Media experts in their Twitter bios. Come on folks- almost all the various social media platforms are in their infancy. Really? You’re an authority? A guru?
Worse though is that people write it as if it’s impressive. Said Ian, “You can be an authority in your field without coming off like a clown- charisma should be seen/heard, not stated!” I mentioned that I was seeing more and more people call themselves experts and Ian suggested a small experiment: go thru my followers and see how many different words people used to describe themselves.
I have 1,100 followers. I went thru all their bios. My findings:
- The following words were used: expert, ninja (?!), dude, authority, nerd
- Words I did not expect to find but found: fanatic, aficionado, provocateur, enthusiast
- Words I’ve seen elsewhere but did not appear in my follower’s bios: maven, guru, rockstar, sensei, queen, diva, princess, superstar, damn good, zen master of SM, MVP
You’ll notice that the word “evangelist” is missing from the above lists. As Jay Frost put it, “And that is why “evangelist” is not on my list of moronic monikers. Even in 2011, we need to advocate for fundraising!”
Call yourself what you want- but an authority? Guru? Ninja??? Do me a small favor:
1) Go to Rabbi Google
2) Type in “Whats a ninja”
3) Click on the first result
4) Read the first paragraph
5) Reread the first paragraph
Is that what you wanna call yourself???!!!
Not all the words above bother me. Enthusiast and fanatic, for instance, are ok. Aficionado was an interesting one.
I decided to ask some of my Twitter friends what bugged them about some of the words. Here’s what NPO pro Lesley Pinder had to say, “Guru- smugness and the presumption of knowing better. Maven has always bugged me– it’s just a bit highfalutin for me.”
There have to be better ways to tell people you understand social media and know how to use it effectively. But rockstar, zen master and superstar are NOT it.
Parting words come from my good friend and NPO event organizer extraordinaire Shanon Doolittle: “As an expert maven in all things ninja-like, I endorse gurus pimping their evangelistic skills in their rockstar bios.”
Nuff said.
Bonus reading: Claire Kerr’s Twitter bio
Double Bonus reading: Here’s what Matthew Smith has to say about so-called Social Media Experts







Yup, after a decade in fundraising & NGO management, I still love it. What attracted me in the first place- PR, grantwriting, the ask, forging relationships, presentations, cause marketing, budgeting, social media & more- still pique my curiosity. So I thought I'd share my NGO "rants and raves" with you. Hopefully, you'll learn something new. Worst case scenario? You'll review something you already knew. Enjoy!
Ephraim
October 11th, 2011 at 3:55 pm
It seems we both blogged about this today. I appreciate your take…and even though we got there differently, I’m glad we reached the same conclusion. I hate to be “that guy” who provides an invited cross-promotion link, but I’d be curious to hear your response to my post: http://matthewsm1th.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-social-media-expert/
October 11th, 2011 at 4:46 pm
My least favorite is “Nazi.” Seriously? Two blogs for you: http://www.redheadwriting.com/if-i-can-see-you-youre-not-a-ninja and http://wagnerwrites.com/blog/ninjas-nuts-and-monkeys/. Thanks for writing this.
October 11th, 2011 at 7:02 pm
thanx Claire- read the two posts and all I can say is: oy!!!
of course, nuts and monkeys really makes no sense but who am I to quibble with the “experts”
Matthew- I’m gonna add your post to my post- well said and sooooooo true!
November 17th, 2011 at 2:51 pm
Great stuff! I find the overuse of self-promoting adjectives on Twitter, and not just for social media but for any discipline, rather annoying and tending towards narcissism. For example, if one uses two or more adjectives prior to the noun, it’s just too much. Incredibly awesome consultant, supremely skilled professional, etc. etc. Personal fave: “amazingly savvy (fill in the blank)”. Really? Isn’t “savvy” sufficient as a stand-alone? My experience has been that the more adjectives used to describe oneself, the lower the level and quality of engagement. Thanks for ranting on this topic, loved it.
November 17th, 2011 at 5:25 pm
hey Susan- amazingly savvy made me laugh!!!!!
I guess everyone has to stand out somehow…ugh!